Bible Translations |

October 2, 2019 at 4:44 am #242

Member

[RESPONSETO]

Dayna Says wrote:

John Cannon wrote:

Actually, I think you could call them versions, not just revisions. NKJV is a little more than just corrections of grammar and spelling, it is a modernization of an old text. I would agree with Jim in that the 1901 ASV is probably a better translation. The problem is finding a 1901 in print.

Your wrong the KJV is translated out of the Recieved Text “Textus Receptus” the NKJV is NOT a modern version of the KJV, the NKJV as most all modern translation including 1901 ASV

are translated out of the courpt Alexandrian Text or the Westcott-Hort Text. You are right in one thing these modren translations maybe a little more grammaticly correct but the underlying text in which they come from are corrupt.

[/RESPONSETO]