Parents: You do know your children are being taught the theory of evolution probably without a single reference to any other perspective on origins, other than those ridiculing the modern anti-Christ status quo perspective?
It is also very likely that by the time your children, after being taken to church all their lives, will most likely abandon Christianity at least for a season of life upon entering college with intent to study science. Most go for other categories, but most will still be required to take a science course or two as a Freshman. In those classes it is highly likely the teacher (professor) will be pro-evolutionist and anti religious. They pay attention to the test scores of students, and their apparent beliefs. If your child speaks up for the Bible it is practically inevitable the professor and classmates will openly taunt your child, thereby suppressing all challenges. The result will be a lowered grade if there is no "progress" toward "enlightenment".
Many people who thought themselves to be Christian have abandoned the faith because of such pressures from peers in their youth and later in life. Some survived into middle life, then to abandon Christ once convinced Genesis is merely a collection of "goat-herder" comments, taught that by atheists and severely deceived "Christians" who value science enough to attack the Bible. On the internet believers of all ages are being challenged over their beliefs, called to replace that with modern science. Most don't realize science knowledge is somewhat like human skin cells, daily dying and being replaced at an astounding rate. By the end of your life what is called science today will be obsolete. If science becomes your "religion" today, your religion will become a different religion then.
The Book of Genesis of the Bible is a record of revelation and commandments from God to early man, through Moses the prophet among the Hebrew people after release from centuries of slavery in Egypt. Jesus and the apostles reference Genesis. Why? Because Christianity is largely based on the principles of Genesis, from original sin, to punishment of sin, and salvation. Without the knowledge of Genesis there would be no reason for Christ and His New Covenant.
If the accounts of Genesis were not real life events, then those would necessarily be regarded as imaginary campfire myths, in modern terms expressed as metaphors rather than a literal account of an event. If a metaphor helps us understand something real, then metaphors are wisely chosen tools of literature. But if they result in belief a real-life topic is fanciful, not real, then the steps God took to bring man to Christ would be merely fanciful, a great fairy tale.
I regularly read a wide variety science journals, still have access to subscriptions started and enjoyed as part of my career. Science has been my life career, mostly in biology fields, but bridged to geo-sciences, but mostly specialties like wetlands ecology and wildlife habitat management and forestry. However, I am strongly opposed to the use of modern science when it is used to denigrate Christian beliefs in Christ and the foundational Old Testament facts. Christ Jesus was a real man on Earth, Lord and Savior, and what is recorded of Him in the Bible is real. Otherwise, I enjoy modern science when conducted in a manner honoring the full definition of the "Scientific Method". The chief characteristic which distinguishes a scientific method of inquiry from other methods of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself, supporting a theory when a theory's predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its predictions prove false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Unfortunately, most of the supposed new knowledge, contrary to fair use of the Scientific Method, supporting the theory of evolution is sponsored and/or conducted by scientists having a vested interest in that theory, in the form of a sponsored evolution museum tourist hotspot in Germany, or perhaps drawing grant money for university coffers. "Global Warming" pseudo-science exists for the same purposes, really very big money. When encountering discoveries that are contrary to their core beliefs they tend to bury such knowledge, like happened with "Climate-gate", which has been tamped down with admissions of deleted emails and a troubling lack of openness from the scientists involved. Follow the money. There is a huge cache of mostly taxpayer funds for support of human-caused climate change claims and evolution. Christians should disassociate from conflicting interests like those, and have been doing that within reason.
Disciples of Christ today know Jesus, know God personally, and can't be pulled away from God over any science or other knowledge preferred by men. Too late, we know. But not all claiming Christ are to that point of knowing, falling short of studying sufficiently to know untruth when it comes by. But we all have an adversary, Satan (the Devil) a fallen angel, who is doubtless behind the support of the evolution theory. The end game play is to separate as many people as possible from God, using a technique most people applaud as "fair", science, but not knowing the technique is evil. It's like football players being specially rewarded financial payment for putting an opponent star player on a stretcher and out of at least that game. We're seeing that in the basketball playoffs too. Fans cheer the play that prevents a score, then maybe regret a severe injury, sort of. Satan wants every believer off the field if at all possible. The reward to unbelievers who are in charge of science is to remain in charge, filling their pockets to make for happy careers.
So what is so repugnant to a disciple of Christ about evolution of man from a lower life form? Man can't logivcally be ignored by evolutionists, so we have to deal with his place in the scheme. If modern man emerged from some lower life form from which apes came, then man would bear an animal nature he shouldn't be held accountable for by standards of a holy God. Therefore, the theory of evolution would require that man is theologically equal with gorillas, though evolutionists of course theoretically don't involve themselves with theological issues. That's why they don't. It's a sticky issue. Men often do many evil things no animal can do. The sin gap between men and animals is too great.
It is my dream that more Christians will speak up, get involved. It isn't necessary to read science journals or be able to debate against almost mystical words of geneticists and famous authors promoting evolution. Evolutionists love to bury us in such challenges. It is the duty of Christians to preach the GOSPEL, not match evolutionist arguments point by point, and to do that using these debates as your pulpit. I look for every opportunity to take the debates back to the message of God.
Not a parent? Don't know what you are supposed to do for Jesus? All of us are commanded to spread the good news.
·...¸><((((º>
.··´¯`·.¸.·><((((º>
·.¸.·´¯`·...¸.·><((((º>
Be fishers of men
It is also very likely that by the time your children, after being taken to church all their lives, will most likely abandon Christianity at least for a season of life upon entering college with intent to study science. Most go for other categories, but most will still be required to take a science course or two as a Freshman. In those classes it is highly likely the teacher (professor) will be pro-evolutionist and anti religious. They pay attention to the test scores of students, and their apparent beliefs. If your child speaks up for the Bible it is practically inevitable the professor and classmates will openly taunt your child, thereby suppressing all challenges. The result will be a lowered grade if there is no "progress" toward "enlightenment".
Many people who thought themselves to be Christian have abandoned the faith because of such pressures from peers in their youth and later in life. Some survived into middle life, then to abandon Christ once convinced Genesis is merely a collection of "goat-herder" comments, taught that by atheists and severely deceived "Christians" who value science enough to attack the Bible. On the internet believers of all ages are being challenged over their beliefs, called to replace that with modern science. Most don't realize science knowledge is somewhat like human skin cells, daily dying and being replaced at an astounding rate. By the end of your life what is called science today will be obsolete. If science becomes your "religion" today, your religion will become a different religion then.
The Book of Genesis of the Bible is a record of revelation and commandments from God to early man, through Moses the prophet among the Hebrew people after release from centuries of slavery in Egypt. Jesus and the apostles reference Genesis. Why? Because Christianity is largely based on the principles of Genesis, from original sin, to punishment of sin, and salvation. Without the knowledge of Genesis there would be no reason for Christ and His New Covenant.
If the accounts of Genesis were not real life events, then those would necessarily be regarded as imaginary campfire myths, in modern terms expressed as metaphors rather than a literal account of an event. If a metaphor helps us understand something real, then metaphors are wisely chosen tools of literature. But if they result in belief a real-life topic is fanciful, not real, then the steps God took to bring man to Christ would be merely fanciful, a great fairy tale.
I regularly read a wide variety science journals, still have access to subscriptions started and enjoyed as part of my career. Science has been my life career, mostly in biology fields, but bridged to geo-sciences, but mostly specialties like wetlands ecology and wildlife habitat management and forestry. However, I am strongly opposed to the use of modern science when it is used to denigrate Christian beliefs in Christ and the foundational Old Testament facts. Christ Jesus was a real man on Earth, Lord and Savior, and what is recorded of Him in the Bible is real. Otherwise, I enjoy modern science when conducted in a manner honoring the full definition of the "Scientific Method". The chief characteristic which distinguishes a scientific method of inquiry from other methods of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself, supporting a theory when a theory's predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its predictions prove false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Unfortunately, most of the supposed new knowledge, contrary to fair use of the Scientific Method, supporting the theory of evolution is sponsored and/or conducted by scientists having a vested interest in that theory, in the form of a sponsored evolution museum tourist hotspot in Germany, or perhaps drawing grant money for university coffers. "Global Warming" pseudo-science exists for the same purposes, really very big money. When encountering discoveries that are contrary to their core beliefs they tend to bury such knowledge, like happened with "Climate-gate", which has been tamped down with admissions of deleted emails and a troubling lack of openness from the scientists involved. Follow the money. There is a huge cache of mostly taxpayer funds for support of human-caused climate change claims and evolution. Christians should disassociate from conflicting interests like those, and have been doing that within reason.
Disciples of Christ today know Jesus, know God personally, and can't be pulled away from God over any science or other knowledge preferred by men. Too late, we know. But not all claiming Christ are to that point of knowing, falling short of studying sufficiently to know untruth when it comes by. But we all have an adversary, Satan (the Devil) a fallen angel, who is doubtless behind the support of the evolution theory. The end game play is to separate as many people as possible from God, using a technique most people applaud as "fair", science, but not knowing the technique is evil. It's like football players being specially rewarded financial payment for putting an opponent star player on a stretcher and out of at least that game. We're seeing that in the basketball playoffs too. Fans cheer the play that prevents a score, then maybe regret a severe injury, sort of. Satan wants every believer off the field if at all possible. The reward to unbelievers who are in charge of science is to remain in charge, filling their pockets to make for happy careers.
So what is so repugnant to a disciple of Christ about evolution of man from a lower life form? Man can't logivcally be ignored by evolutionists, so we have to deal with his place in the scheme. If modern man emerged from some lower life form from which apes came, then man would bear an animal nature he shouldn't be held accountable for by standards of a holy God. Therefore, the theory of evolution would require that man is theologically equal with gorillas, though evolutionists of course theoretically don't involve themselves with theological issues. That's why they don't. It's a sticky issue. Men often do many evil things no animal can do. The sin gap between men and animals is too great.
It is my dream that more Christians will speak up, get involved. It isn't necessary to read science journals or be able to debate against almost mystical words of geneticists and famous authors promoting evolution. Evolutionists love to bury us in such challenges. It is the duty of Christians to preach the GOSPEL, not match evolutionist arguments point by point, and to do that using these debates as your pulpit. I look for every opportunity to take the debates back to the message of God.
Not a parent? Don't know what you are supposed to do for Jesus? All of us are commanded to spread the good news.
·...¸><((((º>
.··´¯`·.¸.·><((((º>
·.¸.·´¯`·...¸.·><((((º>
Be fishers of men


