Q
(Subscribe)
Featured on the Web
Links
A Synopsis for Q [Add to My Praize]
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-synopsis.html
The parallel passages between Matthew and Luke that are thought to represent Q are presented.
Burton Mack's Translation [Add to My Praize]
http://www.cygnus-study.com/pageq.shtml
The text of Q as presented in The Lost Gospel by Dr. Burton Mack.
Four-Color Synopsis [Add to My Praize]
http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/harmony/
The parallel passages of Matthew, Mark, and Luke in the original Greek with color coding. Useful for identifying the double tradition material that makes up Q.
Mark Without Q [Add to My Praize]
http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/q/
Mark Goodacre argues against the Two Source Hypothesis in favor the Farrer hypothesis, according to which Luke obtained the "Q" material from the Gospel of Matthew.
NT Gateway: Q [Add to My Praize]
http://www.ntgateway.com/synoptic/Q.htm
Links to articles and essays addressing the subject of Q.
Q // Thomas Parallels [Add to My Praize]
http://www.miseri.edu/users/davies/thomas/thq.htm
The parallel passages between Q and Thomas as presented by Stevan Davies.
Q Sayings in Luke [Add to My Praize]
http://www.miseri.edu/users/davies/thomas/q.htm
The Q material as found in Luke and presented by Stevan Davies.
The Canonical Status of Q [Add to My Praize]
http://religion.rutgers.edu/jseminar/q_canon.html
Mahlon Smith argues that Q belongs in the scholar's canon.
The Contents of Q [Add to My Praize]
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-contents.html
The verses in Q in several lists provided by modern commentators.
The Existence of Q [Add to My Praize]
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-exist.html
A scholarly defense of the Two Source Hypothesis according to which Matthew and Luke used Mark as well as a second non-extant source termed Q.
